06/17/13 10:36 PM Filed in:
Video Vixens
I was looking at this Facebook post today of
newcomer Sareenah Davis
at
Natural Model
Management, and I noticed some commenters
seemed offended that she might not be wearing a
bottoms. “She is…beautiful, but the bare hiney is bit
much for the public” wrote one Facebooker. “[S]he
is a VERY bad girl!” wrote another. This isn’t
strong reproach obviously, but it reminded me of
the double standard you often see with curvier
women when
it comes to sexy
themes. Keep in mind, this exact same pose was used
for Jennifer Aniston on the cover of Rolling Stone
magazine. While it caused some stir at the time, it
was mainly because it was one of the few times we’ve
seen a completely naked celebrity on a mainstream
magazine cover, not because it was provocatively
sexual.
In American mainstream, voluptuous women are
portrayed as either overly sexual or not sexual at
all (as in zero exposure in a sexual manner in
mainstream media). It’s a rock and a hard place. Even
if tastefully photographed, a curvy woman showing the
same amount of skin as a skinny one is considered
inappropriate, erotic or obscene. We saw this with
the Lane Bryant commercial controversy
with Ashley Graham. Or in a smaller way, with the
Sareenah photo which is virtually the same as Jen
Aniston’s cover printed for a couple million
Americans for Rolling Stone magazine.
The media tells us that “curvy” is undesirable -
young women should want to be thin. So which is it?
Are curvy women too desirable or not desirable
enough? Or maybe - just maybe - the mainstream media
is wrong and curvy women are just plain hot.
Tags: SAREENAH
06/14/13 12:23 PM Filed in:
Video Vixens
06/09/13 01:22 AM Filed in:
Video Vixens